A couple of weeks ago I was driving home late at night and, stupidly, got caught by a speed camera. I was doing a fairly reasonable (in my opinion!) 81mph, but there’s not a lot that one can do when the letter arrives. I’ve commented before on the increased dependency on machines (and bureaucracy) to watch over us (whether that be databases containing our health records or criminal records used to make decisions about us or our children) and speed cameras are another element of that. Instead of a policeman (who can make a judgement about my driving, taking into account conditions, other traffic and how I act) there’s a camera, which takes a photo that gets sent out with the question - “were you driving?”.
I responded, sending a cheque to the nice people and admitting my guilt, barely giving it another thought, until I got a message today (Hi Richard!) pointing out the danger of the sending the forms. Along with the form itself, one needs to send one’s driving license (both parts - including the photo card, which is the most common photo ID in use). The main form though - requires a whole slew of personal data, but nothing too unusual. What caught my eye (and Richard’s) was the payment details - the form contains a nice section for paying with a credit card, but remarkably requires one to enter the CCV (three digit security code on the back)!! Do these people seriously expect anyone to send this through the unprotected postal service - especially when we harp on about using encryption online?
For anyone wishing to commit fraud, either regular or identity-based, then targeting these letters in the postal service would be a good start!